[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (IIAlive) SI! vs. TM (fan the flames)
- Subject: Re: (IIAlive) SI! vs. TM (fan the flames)
- From: fmlin@netcom.com (Frank M. Lin)
- Date: Thu, 6 May 1993 23:46:42 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
- References: <9305052004.AA07049@apple.com> <1sa7el$9tk@apple.com>
>I thought that the article was _VERY_ pro-The Manager and didn't even mention
>the absolutely annoying million redraws that The Manager does all the time
>(which effectively slow down the application switching time to much longer
>than for SwitchIt).
I've said this many times... you can tell TM to keep only the windows of
the foreground application open. With this option, it can switch faster
than SI. How ever, being able to keep all application's window visible is
one of their selling point ( Mac Finder like... ).
>They didn't seem to say much good about SwitchIt, which, from discussion here
>on Internet, is much more compatible with various combinations of apps than
>The Manager.
SI is compatible with ALL the desktop application I own. I can't say the same
for TM, but TM is decent. But for non-desktop application, TM seems to be
more compatible. For exmaple, ProSEL, Columns, VIAD... etc. doesn't work
with SI. SI currently have zero support for ProDOS 8.
If Jawaid take some of my suggestions for SI, next version of SI will kick butt.
:)
--
frank m. lin
fmlin@netcom.com