Re: (II Alive) Switch-It! vs. The Manager (fan the flames)

[jamesb@ecst.csuchico.edu (James L. Brookes)]

In article <C66CBM.1rK@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> bird@cbnewsd.cb.att.com
(j.l.walters) writes:
>From article <1993Apr27.174102.16391@news.columbia.edu>, by
stc7@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Steven T Chiang):

>> 	This is pretty lame.  SI! is more compatible than the Manager,
>
>Why can't we simply tell folks our views without calling those that
>disagree somehow brain damaged?

Unfortunately, when someone's views are incorrect they get attacked.  We've
already had a post from Brian Tao that Graphicwriter III works just fine
under SwitchIt!  II Alive claimed otherwise.  That's a factual error, not
a matter of opinion.

>If you are right and they are brain damaged /by definition/ there is
>no way they would be able to discern their affliction (and your are
>a clod/fool for mentioning it)

I think you're getting a little too clever for yourself here. 

>If you are incorrect and they are not brain damaged - (The most probable
>outcome), you look like a clod/fool i.e., you are a loser from the
>get-go.
>
>I hope that the above two paragraphs has pointed out to those that
>normally ATTACK any and all folks just how stupid you look to the rest
>of the net.

So, Steve now "attacks any and all folks"?  Since when?  Are you prepared
to back up your blanket statement, hm?

>		Joe Walters att!ihlpm!bird, NW 31-K14 (708) 224-7189
>		To know, and not to do, is not yet to know

>		Joe Walters att!ihlpm!bird, NW 31-K14 (708) 224-7189
>		To know, and not to do, is not yet to know

FYI, your .sig is appearing twice.
-- 
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|          James Brookes            | Inet: bb252@cleveland.freenet.edu |
|``What, me worry?'' - A. E. Neuman |   jamesb@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu |
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::