Re: Emulator for iPhone

[datajerk <datajerk@gmail.com>]

On Sep 6, 10:25 am, limtc <thyech...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9月6日, 下午11时27分, datajerk <dataj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's lame that you cannot download your own images to run.  It's not
> > impossible, e.g. the 41CX emulator (i41CX+) supports any module if it
> > is posted somewhere in a directory browseable URL--you just point to
> > it, download, and run.  Its up to the user to decided if they can run
> > that module, not Apple.
>
> This is against Apple SDK rule I think, not developer's fault.

No its not.  c64 software/floppy images is just data for the
emulator.  There are many iPhone apps that download unique data via
the net, as does the c64 emulator, but the c64 author gets to decide
what you can download, just like the App store.

> makes this emulator unique is that everything is licensed, and you
> don't need to download ROM somewhere.

Irrelevant.  I think its great that he got the ROM's licensed.  What I
am talking about is floppy images.

> What you are suggesting has
> nothing to do with this software author

It has everything to do with the author.

> Now I think that maybe Apple II emulator might not be possible to be
> released in App Store since I don't think Apple will ever licensed the
> ROM to any other vendors. :(

One can only hope.