[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PT3
>There's another _real_ limit ... macro size. GEM won't work with my
>normal copy of PT3 because I have too many phone entries and stuff.
>That's not very nice, I do not need 3.5MB scrollback and about 40k for
>macros or such ....
>
>So, yes, let's bug InTrec about removing any and all memory
>limitations they have set for PT3 :)
What do you mean by limited macro size?
>>So, shall we start to flook Intrec's mailbox?
>
>Maybe, but remain polite. Flaming them is surely not the way to go.
>No, that's not directed at you, it's just the The Net at large is not
>always very cautious with what gets written.
Be polite, of course. I'm sure Intrec will be happy that we all find pt3
useful, and love, except for these minor ( annoying ) limits. I would not even
mind if this update costs $10-15.
--
frank m. lin
fmlin@netcom.com
- References:
- Re: PT3
- From: jmk3@crux1.cit.cornell.edu (Jay Krell)
- Re: PT3
- From: fmlin@netcom.com (Frank M. Lin)
- Re: PT3
- From: behrenss@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Soenke Behrens)