[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
11 most influential microprocessors of all time
- Subject: 11 most influential microprocessors of all time
- From: Ken Gagne <kgagne@gamebits.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- Injection-info: w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.186.116.126; posting-account=mv4hUAkAAACWdPhpWyr4K7Q6SENtUSp6
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- User-agent: G2/1.0
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:13281
I recently found this article on an esoteric topic:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/171171/
The Apple II's 6502 is on page 8 as the fifth most important
microprocessor -- but it's a bit hard to order the importance of such
things. As Tony D. pointed out to me, many processors are built upon
or influenced by others -- so if an underpowered processor led
directly to a revolutionary one, who is to say which is more
"influential"? Perhaps the above list would've been better presented
as a timeline than a ranking.
What do you think of the hardware PC World chose and how they
presented it? Would you have chosen differently?
Ken
(full disclosure: I'm an employee of a sister publication of PC World.
There is no incentive for me to promote their content, though... I
just think this is an interesting topic.)