[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ramfast
In article <C2GL2E.B7o@news.iastate.edu> irsman@iastate.edu (Ian Schmidt) writes:
>In article <01GUPV57N9Z48Y6988@ALBION.BITNET> AKARPENKO@ALBION.BITNET writes:
>>What is the difference between revision C and D?
>>Thanks.
>
>Rev D is a much smaller, cooler, less power-hungry board. It has special
>circuitry so it can do DMA to incompatible cards (unless a TransSuck GS is
>in the system; Zips work fine). There's no real speed difference or software
>difference.
Another difference between Rev B/C and D is that Rev. D comes with two
cache sizes, 256K and 1 Meg. Although from the responces I've heard,
having 1 meg doesn't really make it any faster (in the real world.)
>
>--
> Ian Schmidt - Two Meg Software: irsman@{iastate.edu | aol.com}
>"I will choose a path that's | Author of AudioZap, MODZap, and more.
> clear: I will choose free will" | Co-author of SoundConvert and DeskTracker.
> - N. Peart, 1980 | Presenting: the compressed Amiga check _/
Jimmy
--
Jimmy Shaw RamFAST, ZipGSX and System 6... Apple II Forever!
jimmys@ics.uci.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------