Re: BASIC.SYSTEM replacement with DOS 3.3 i/o hook semantics?

[Toinet <antoine.vignau@laposte.net>]

On 19 août, 18:50, lyricalnanoha <lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org>
wrote:
(cut cut)
>
> So I figured I'd want to try this again.  (I've never really "gotten"
> ProDOS though, even with Beneath Apple ProDOS, so :/)
>

Yes, go on with ProDOS 8 & Basic.System (or please try GS/OS ;-)


> In particular - the programs I want to port can be modified trivially to
> work around file access semantics, filename limitations, etc. - but the
> parts which crash BASIC.SYSTEM or cause it to malfunction can't be
> patched.  

Let me reuse what I have read in your email: "(Why? Why not!)"


>
> -uso.

antoine