Re: Ciderpress for OS/X?

[datajerk <datajerk@gmail.com>]

On Aug 11, 2:46 pm, Alex Freed <alex_n...@mirrow.com> wrote:
> Bill Buckels wrote:
>
> > Another nice thing about Aztec C is the shear number of library routines
> > that are kicking-around for the Apple II. Bite me, but this really is easy
> > isn't it?
>
> Did anyone compare the code generated by Aztec with that from cc65? I'm
> more concerned about  the size than the speed.
>
> -Alex.

I tried, but I could not get cc65 to compile my code.  It errors with
too many local variables.  So I gave up.  But I would like to compare
the speed of my pi.c program.  cc65 vs Aztec. mano-a-mano.