Re: ebay dilemma / cdr seller

[PZ <skierpaul@yahoo.com>]

On Jun 2, 10:36 pm, ramito <ram...@san.rr.com> wrote:
> On 2009-05-27 17:45:26 -0700, ramito <ram...@san.rr.com> said:
>
>
>
> > On 2009-05-27 07:00:18 -0700, kbuchholz1...@hotmail.com said:
>
> >> Your concern was legitimate.  I just wish you addressed it with me
> >> first, or at least brought me into the discussion here.
>
> > <snip>
>
> > thanks for seeing it as a legit concern. And as I did point out to you
> > in email and also here,  yes I do see it as a service to
> > retro-hobbyists and no biggie. Despite yoru preference, I think it
> > would have been very poor form to call your name out or call you into a
> > public discussion.
>
> > Naturally, and I think logically, it made more made sense to me just to
> > ask 'a2 community' here what they thought rather than the person who
> > was selling the cdrs which caused my initial concern .
>
> > I don't have lawyers & I am not a rocket scientist either, I'll admit.
> > So as I hoped, folks here gave me good advice & set me right.  Sorry
> > for the 2-3 day delay & for any inconvenience. Please accept my public
> > apologies!
>
> > -Louis
>
> Just to get this off my chest:
>
> Nice. One week delay, item as described and you give me a NEGATIVE??
>
>  Because I made an inquiry OFF-ebay - which you admitted WAS a legit
> concern - and which i even APOLOGIZED for on that forum - and yet this
> buyer felt the need  to ruin my 100% rating on ebay on 900+
> transactions and give me a NEGATIVE?
>
> Go figure some people.

Ramito, it is what it is.  1 Neg among 900+ will still keep your
rating at 99.8%.  I'd buy from you, my threshold is around 97% before
I start to wonder whats up. Time to let it be water under the bridge.

MdntTrain, no need for flames, so you don't agree, fine. I think among
the scope of things, both sides have valid arguments to an extent.  I
wouldn't want to be in either one of these positions.

- Paul