[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IS SPAM FROM http://www.usenetmonster.com RUINING USENET?



PZ wrote:
On May 24, 4:54 pm, Steven Lichter <diespamm...@ikillspammers.com>
wrote:
Dr J R Stockton wrote:> In alt.msdos.batch.nt message <eJdSl.58583$Jc3.31...@newsfe16.iad>, Sun,
24 May 2009 10:29:09, Bill Buckels <bbuck...@mts.net> posted:
"Bill Buckels" <bbuck...@mts.net> wrote:
If this organization is responsible for the influx of spam we are seeing
recently we need to get them cut-off from usenet.
I am having the registration of this domain investigated. It appears to be
bogus. Perhaps I can have their enitire server farm removed from the
internet.
The same apparently needs to be done to  googlegroups.com  for the same
sort of reason.
It looks like they got the fool stopped, at least for now.  The only way
to really stop spammers is to switch the way the whole network is set
up, and that is a few years away, or hunt them down and really kill
them, start with Africa and Asia to stop the scams by really killing the
poster and putting a graphic color picture on the net.

--
The Only Good Spammer is a Dead one!! Have you hunted one down today?
(c) 2009  I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot In Hell Co.

We could create a nntp news server and web forum (based at
a2central.com for example) which would moderate the csa2 feeds there.
Google groups would still archive the spam, but our archive wouldn't.
We could add an additional forum there for our own general ranting and
blather thats OT.  I know syndicomm had something for the genie crowd
there when it was a pay service, but I never really looked into it.

The downside would be that if you read other usenet forums, you'd have
to download 2 seperate newsfeeds for csa2 content.

- Paul

You would still need someone to read all the feeds and filter them, that is unless you required all posters to put something in the subject line to make it easier to filter. I belong to a moderated telecom group and a post requires telecom to be in the subject line, when you reply it is already in place, he has filters which dump all the others. It still is a lot of work.

Right now a new system is under test, it is called Internet2, that is its beta name. The system is years away and requires a address to be fully be verified before it would allow the mail or a post be sent.
AT&T requires the address to be verified in e-mail, but not in posting.

The Can Spam act is a total joke and if anyone is stupid enough to reply to an opt out link, you will just get tons more spam.

A few weeks ago a scam managed to get though my filters, I send over 50,000 e-mails to his address with each on containing all the data I had in an old H/D, took his server out.

--
The Only Good Spammer is a Dead one!! Have you hunted one down today? (c) 2009 I Kill Spammers, Inc. A Rot In Hell Co.