[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cpmtools Win32 wanted
- Subject: Re: cpmtools Win32 wanted
- From: "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:50:56 -0600
- Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm, comp.sys.apple2
- References: <C6qSk.3441$6s5.269@newsfe01.iad> <491a81f7$0$11242$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de>
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.os.cpm:4761 comp.sys.apple2:14017
"Michael Haardt" <michael@moria.de> wrote in message
news:491a81f7$0$11242$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de...
>Btw, there is 2.8 now, but it contains only a few small fixes, nothing that
>helps with your problem.
1. Version 2.8 has different issues when building on my Windows machine than
2.7. I have decided that I am more comfortable with 2.7. I am open to
changing my mind if someone else will build 2.8 and get cpmchmod working
with Apple II disk images. It doesn't work in 2.7 either but cacks badly on
my 2.8 build in getopt I suspect.
2. I would also appreciate someone getting pdcurses working for the Windows
build and then telling me in detail how they did it. I have built pdcurses
with the intention of getting fsed.cpm built for windows but don't know
where to place the lib file or the header nor how to edit the config to use
this library with the putw check.
Or is ncurses better in Windows or is there actually an okey-dokey curses
port that works since 2000 when John Elliot did the Windows port?
3. Udo Munk has presented many valid arguments throughout this thread.
Although I still prefer the MinGW build without dependencies on cygwin1.dll
his point of view is a reasonable and logical point of view and I thank him
for taking time to present the arguments against native Windows in general.
I agree with Udo that one should expect more from Microsoft and also more
understanding of unix in a comp.os newsgroup by people like me who profess
to know everything.
However, since no-one can know everything despite self-agrandizing and
self-indulgence I think that Udo really expects to educate people like me
although he might have already given-up on Microsoft:)
4. Peter Dassow's enthusiasm over this whole Apple II CP/M business is also
cool, as well as David Schmidt's.
5. I suspect that due to the 2 of them and Udo and Michael's feedback that I
will keep going with the Windows build until I get everything including
fsed.cpm compiled in 2.8.
In the meantime I am going to finish-off the cpmtools 2.7 Apple II Binary
build with html manpages augmented with info on using cpmtools with the
Apple II and distribute this from the Aztec C website, with an optional
download of my build environment and the source and additional README. I
will also put the completed html manpages live on the aztec c website.
That's my plan.
Thanks All who responded to this thread so far. This includes Rolf Harmann,
Stevo Tarkin, and Richard Brady who probably doesn't even know watfor:) and
others who will all be mentioned in my acknowledgements on this stuff unless
they prefer not.
Bill