[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spam
On Oct 23, 12:56 am, "Robert Miles" <robertmi...@bellsouthNOSPAM.net>
wrote:
> "Doug Miller" <spamb...@milmac.com> wrote in message
>
> news:BgSLk.3105$Ei5.2059@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...> In article <20081022160808.0c240...@wolfenstein.jpl.nasa.gov>, Jason Zheng
> > <Xin.Zh...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> >>Best way to stop abuse from google groups posters is to send your
> >>complaint email to groups-ab...@google.com
>
> > On *my* planet, Google completely ignores complaints.
> > What planet are *you* on?
>
> .
> I'm on Earth, where Google Groups eventually acts against
> complaints that match their definition of spam - which may
> not match yours - but often takes complaints about each
> instance of the spam for about 6 weeks to do it. I doubt
> if frequent posts with "spam" in the title, but no ads in the
> body of the posts, would match their definition.
>
> They are, however, much more active at blocking anything
> that matches their definition from reaching anyone who
> used Google Groups to read the posts.
You say it takes Google 6 weeks to act, yet the life-span of the spam
is a couple of days. See the problem now?
In my experience, Google has never done a thing to curb spam. In some
cases, they do less than nothing.
<rant>
Google is the new evil. Just as MS decided how people were to use
computers and forced that model on people, Google is deciding on how
people are to use The Internet, and is forcing that model on all their
users. Argh.
</rant>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: spam
- From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>