[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2

Subject: Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
From: "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 19:57:36 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <3dc74321-57e9-49a9-9f0e-07517b4fe3cf@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <n8-dncbtUYWz1CrVnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <S-KdnWeDV7VEzCrVnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@comcast.com> <9GJtk.14179$4s1.1851@newsfe06.iad> <c030a7f9-34da-44ac-8f95-3c97fe20652d@s20g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:3004

<aiiadict@gmail.com> wrote in message 
c030a7f9-34da-44ac-8f95-3c97fe20652d@s20g2000prd.googlegroups.com">news:c030a7f9-34da-44ac-8f95-3c97fe20652d@s20g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>I've got a Titan Accelerator available for sale/trade

If this is the //e compatible one, what would you want for it? The Transwarp 
isn't exactly my perfect solution either.

I wish Charlie would sell me the 8 MGHZ zip chip would be my perfect 
solution.

Bill

References:
- ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
  - From: Drew <GoggleDrew@gmail.com>
- Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
  - From: Steven Hirsch <snhirsch@gmail.com>
- Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
  - From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
  - From: "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net>
- Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
  - From: aiiadict@gmail.com

Prev by Date: Re: Various Accelerators
Next by Date: Re: vm02: calling all IIcs - Take 2
Previous by thread: Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
Next by thread: Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread