[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ZIP GSX 1.0.1 vs 1.0.2



"Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote in message 
k9ydnegBBO5h7yrVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com">news:k9ydnegBBO5h7yrVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com...

>Accelerators are not trivial. Btw, ZipChip is not the only one for the IIe, 
>and also, the earlier one for II+ works in them. I've run IIe with 3-4 
>different ones.

Accelerators for the //e are impossible to find. I realize that they are not 
trivial. What is to prevent you or Henry from reverse-engineering an Apple 
//e  zip chip and doing a production run?

Unless someone does this, I will never get one. Henry has one that he needs 
for future testing.

What do you think it would cost if you had a run of 100 or so and took 
pre-orders?

>Oh yeah. Now you need to get a CFFA, as well.

I don't think I need one. This Microdrive seems to work excellently. Why do 
you think I need a CFFA? When I get my GS I will be buying a Microdrive as 
well unless someone gives me a compelling reason not to or indicates why I 
should buy a CFFA instead.

- Buggles