Re: My C Compiler

["Clocky" <nicetry@migo.com>]

"Harry Potter" <maspethrose7@aol.com> wrote in message 
aa5fa3b8-232c-4377-8ab0-8ce8e705a728@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com">news:aa5fa3b8-232c-4377-8ab0-8ce8e705a728@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>I am working on a C compiler under Win32 for 6502-based computers.  I
> know I posted this before, but I just wanted to make sure if it'll be
> used.  It would have the following features over cc65:
>
> *   machine-dependent floats using BASIC ROMs
> *   cc65 has a limited memory model.  My C compiler could give up to
> 61k of data for the C64 and 110k or more for the C128.  It could
> theoretically do the same for other computers.
> *   Overlays: It could load parts of executables from disk on demand.
> NES cartridges could span over 512k if necessary.
> *   more and better optimizations
> *   better graphics: the C64 could have multiple graphics modes with
> the screen at $4000.
> *   It will handle calculations more efficiently by writing operations
> only when executed.
> *   It will handle fastcall and register declarations more
> efficiently.
> *   I borrowed this from Double-Assembler for the C128: it will allow
> linkage to a map file of another program, useful for kernals and OSes.
>
> What do you think?

Talk is cheap?