[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MAB GS vs GSoft

Subject: Re: MAB GS vs GSoft
From: limtc <thyechean@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=218.186.11.2; posting-account=xPI8rAoAAABxyK8KyUIiYChvvtqAeJGI
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <a49a9071-8121-4f8a-ae35-2d8b0c2f1224@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:34879

Redo the test in accelerated GS (I am not sure the speed... it is a
standard Zip GS):

MAB (compiled code): 9s
GSoft (interpreted code): 9-10s

This means whether it is compiled or not become less relevant in an
accelerated GS. In this case, the extra speed gain by doing the extra
step - compiling the code and wait - is not important.

On 5月3日, 上午10时07分, limtc <thyech...@gmail.com> wrote:

> MAB (compiled code): 22s
> GSoft (interpreted code): 24s

References:
- MAB GS vs GSoft
  - From: limtc <thyechean@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Mac compatible Apple IIGS format?
Next by Date: Re: IIgs & ROMBANK
Previous by thread: Re: MAB GS vs GSoft
Next by thread: Mac compatible Apple IIGS format?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread