[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Grappler+ as IO card?

Subject: Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
From: aiiadict@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.142.216.53; posting-account=5kmk9wkAAAB22-WWGK8UTn8vQ5c3EvdQ
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <b49bcafe-0178-4192-925b-890e0c4412c0@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <ef16aa05-5f11-467e-93cf-3b71d63237d4@k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <bi0Sj.12624$GE1.2197@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com> <dbedc0d5-6b62-4076-9f7f-22ec37234b7a@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <NT2Sj.420$17.242@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:34778

On Apr 30, 11:28 am, David Schmenk <dschm...@YUCH.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Its pretty much a direct connection.  I just had to run phi1 through an
> inverter as the only other chip.  Why didn't Woz include phi2 on the
> bus?  One of the great mysteries.  I agree with you and Michael that the
> timers and interrupts are great features - the reason I put mine together.
>

yeah, pretty much direct connect.


http://rich12345.tripod.com/schematics/6522.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

References:
- Grappler+ as IO card?
  - From: Sir Morris <charlie_robson@hotmail.com>
- Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
  - From: aiiadict@gmail.com
- Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
  - From: David Schmenk <dschmenk@YUCH.gmail.com>
- Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
  - From: aiiadict@gmail.com
- Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
  - From: David Schmenk <dschmenk@YUCH.gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
Next by Date: Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
Previous by thread: Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
Next by thread: Re: Grappler+ as IO card?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread