Re: cc65 for Apple 2?

[ol.sc@web.de (Oliver Schmidt)]

Hi Bill,

>You need to know Aztec C. Forget CC65.

>PS - If you used Aztec C rather than this CC65 stuff you wouldn't have
>too many questions. The CC65 stuff whether on the C64 or the Apple IIe
>isn't very well supported as far as I am concerned and although I am
>sure that it probably works the pseudo-knowledge on what to do with it
>is missing volumes.

I don't know where you're coming from but this group is a place of
Apple2 enthusiasts that behave friendly and polite towards each other.

I haven't noticed anybody here saying something negative on Aztec C.
So I ask you to adjust your communication style and stop bashing on
cc65.

If someone who _aims_ to be related to cc65 should have provoced you
then you might need to bark at him. In contrast I have contributed
nearly all of the current of the cc65 C library for the Apple2 (and
have by the way done major contributions to your favorite Apple2
emulator) and I have no problem at all with Aztec C. So please stop
from trying to bring up some fight here (like with that "challenge"
thing the other day) !

BTW: I've been looking quite carefully at Aztec C. Unfortunately I can
see from several statements you made about cc65 that this isn't true
for you the other way round :-(

Best, Oliver