[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RamWorks 3 with expander
In article <5f8340fe-e3d0-4cca-8706-d1a417897690@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
<aiiadict@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 7, 11:29�am, sc...@alfter.DIESPAMMERSDIE.us (Scott Alfter)
>wrote:
>> In article
><e9adc03a-0241-4fa5-9ea2-6f7ceb70f...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>> �<aiiad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 7, 8:10�am, Robert Boucher <bouch...@alumni.texas.net> wrote:
>> >> I have a RamWorks 3 card with expander
>>
>> >It takes a patch, "AW expander"
>>
>> It shouldn't. �Back in the day, I had a RamWorks III, and AppleWorks 3.0 saw
>> the memory on it without any patches. �Patches are necessary for AppleWorks
>> 1.x and 2.x, but shouldn't be needed for 3.0 and up.
>
>Do they automatically recognize RWIII, or just RWIII with <=1 meg?
That, I wouldn't know about for sure, though I'd hope it would enumerate and
use whatever banks are available. I had just the 1 MB that could be
installed on the card, and it saw most of that. (I say "most" because I had
a desktop size somewhere in the neighborhood of 750-800K. That would be
consistent with using just the lower 48K of each bank and leaving the
16K in the ROM/language-card area alone, since there are more hoops to jump
through to access it.)
_/_
/ v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ rm -rf /bin/laden >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?