Re: another RAM +

["Steve_C" <no.spam@no.ma'am>]

"Henry S. Courbis" <apl2research(a.t.)comcast.net> wrote in message 
7MGdnZrNVO0PLwranZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com">news:7MGdnZrNVO0PLwranZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Odd.  I've never seen that version of the GS RAM Plus.  Only one I've ever 
> seen has had the 40 pin header on the face of the card for the DMA option. 
> Rev. D I think is written on the little support tab on the bottom of the 
> card too.
>
>
> -- 
> Henry S. Courbis
> www.ReactiveMicro.com
> Legacy Hardware and Support - Come take a look at what we have to offer!
>

I think it might be a Rev. A before they started putting the revision letter 
on the support tab. I'm pretty sure revision A had the rev. letter somewhere 
else on the card.

Like I said, I highly doubt this card was fully tested, "without flaws" as 
the seller says, with both ROM 1 and ROM 3 machines; especially if this is 
an early version of the card (there is a reason why they made so many 
revisions).  I think there is a 50/50 chance that the buyer is going to end 
up with a card that doesn't work properly in their machine right out of the 
box.