mdj wrote:
On Jun 24, 12:18 am, "Bryan Parkoff" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
"mdj" <mdj....@gmail.com> wrote in message
1182580110.751279.80970@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com">news:1182580110.751279.80970@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 23, 3:57 pm, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
mcph...@yahoo.com wrote:
I know this has been asked before, but I was wondering if there
were
any new RGB to VGA upscaling converters out that were particularly
good for this task. The XRGB-2 is no longer available (and was
pricey).
I would like to do RGB rather than composite to VGA with a GS and a
viewsonic LCD.
Right--if you start with composite, then the result can never be
any better than that, no matter what format you convert to.
The 'simple' solution is to use an LCD TV with a SCART input on it,
and use Roger's IIgs->RGB cable. The results will depend on the
quality of the TV.
I tried this a while back with my TV (A 32" model, a bit inconvenient
placing atop an Apple II) and the results were quite acceptable.
On my
Apple II though, I've now decided to regress to a green phosphor
monochrome display. For a non-gamer, this gives the best possible
results, but I would certainly like to find a small LCD TV that
worked
well.
I would be surprised to see Video (NTSC) to VGA Converter
athttp://www.ramelectronics.net/html/video-vga-gvm-2000.html. I am
sure 80
column is unreadable on VGA screen unless digital filter is used
isntead of
analog. Do you agree?
I'd imagine pretty much all these converters use some form of digital
storage.
The issue is how the composite video is decoded, and what the bandwidth
of the resulting luminance signal is. For NTSC decoding, it is almost
impossible to preserve a luminance bandwidth of more than 3.5MHz, which
isn't enough for good 80-column text. Your monochrome monitor no doubt
has (luminance, of course!) bandwidth exceeding 10MHz.
The AppleColor Composite monitor, when in monochrome mode, switches its
luminance bandwidth to about 8MHz--a capability almost unique in
composite video processing, even in the digital age.
80 column text tends to look a little odd, with alternate scanlines
interpreting the pixel widths slightly differently. Readable, but not
particularly clear.
This is a result an interaction between the monitor's sampling of
what it thinks is an interlaced video signal, but isn't.
What's needed is a converter that can lock onto the Apple II's dot
clock...
Bingo!