[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)

Subject: Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)
From: "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer@hotmail.com>
Date: 12 Apr 2007 10:19:02 -0700
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
In-reply-to: <UtSdnbh9x6d_JIDbnZ2dnUVZ_uzinZ2d@comcast.com>
Injection-info: b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.158.153.238; posting-account=Gu4AAQ0AAACdC3VScydHX0fn3I16YGuB
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <1176220338.793312.122730@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <HbSdnTRpDO0BcYbbnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com> <1176309805.447833.51130@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <UtSdnbh9x6d_JIDbnZ2dnUVZ_uzinZ2d@comcast.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:25074

On Apr 11, 11:47 pm, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:

> In December, 1980, I had a choice of *both* machines new at
> Computerland.  The manufacturing dates were in the fall of
> 1980, judging from the chip dates.
>
> -michael

Wow.  I'd be curious to know exactly how fast II sales plummeted after
the II+ came out, but I'm sure there's more chance of Apple
introducing a successor to the IIGS than ever releasing those sales
figures, assuming they even had them.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)
  - From: "Sean Fahey" <sean.fahey@a2central.com.remove-mpr-this>

References:
- Apple ][ identification (follow up)
  - From: "jsnospam@cimmeri.com" <js@cimmeri.com>
- Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>
- Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)
  - From: "N.N. Thayer" <nnthayer@hotmail.com>
- Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Apple IIGS Cooling
Next by Date: Re: basic language retropedia
Previous by thread: Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)
Next by thread: Re: Apple ][ identification (follow up)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread