Re: Print to SHR

["Payton Byrd" <plbyrd@bellsouth.no.spam.net>]

<heuser.marcus@freenet.de> wrote in message 1173245100.083290.14090@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com">news:1173245100.083290.14090@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 6, 11:40 pm, "Payton Byrd" <plb...@bellsouth.no.spam.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> This is actually a function of Moore's Law.  This is also what killed
>> Commodore as they didn't invest into MOS Technologies as they
>> should have then they got left behind.  At the end they were
>> depending on a 12 year old computer with a 20 year old
>> CPU that was still manufactured as if it were 1982 all over again.
> 
> Are you talking of the Amiga, C64 or Commodore's insufficient,
> "colorless" PC-clones?
>

I know you're trolling, but just for the sake of the Apple denizens that didn't keep up with Commodore, by 1994 the only product Commodore made any money on was the 64c (mainly because they were insanely cheap to make).  By then the Amigas that were being sold weren't holding their own and Commodore (ie Mehdi Ali and Irving Gould) was doing everything it could to rape the assets before going under.