Re: Oberon-2 (oo2c) for 6502

[gnorik@gmail.com]

Hello, Michael!
> I read on google groups that you were planning to add library support as
> inline assembly, this means a strict cc65 only compatibility. That's a bit
> annoying. I would be more than happy to add support for your compiler in the
> Oric SDK, but it's not cc65 based.
oo2c needs ansi compliant compiler, and I think it is possible to use
lcc65 as a portable assembler for oo2c
I thought about lcc because as far as I remember it has float numbers
support.
But firstly I have no lcc sources, so I couldn't compile it under
linux, and secondly cc65 is more ansi like :)
Once binaries have been sent to me but I cannot use them under modern
gnu systems, because glibc changes very fast.
> I guess I could add support for inline assembly in lcc, but last time I
> checked, I didn't get the feeling that cc65 inline assembly syntax was
> really appealing.
It is not the problem if lcc doesn't support inline assembly
I want to keep libraries which have roots in c as well. I believe it
is not hard to port library to lcc65