[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If the Apple II was continued...

Subject: Re: If the Apple II was continued...
From: aiiadict@gmail.com
Date: 24 Jan 2007 18:27:07 -0800
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
In-reply-to: <1169689986.013103.101890@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Injection-info: s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.33.221.238; posting-account=wL7QqAwAAADveYas09gsbDvmMNiULH_b
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <2007012400345516807-thingvolatyahoodotcom@news.panic.com> <1169689986.013103.101890@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:16802


On Jan 24, 8:53 pm, "mmphosis" <markst...@mail.com> wrote:
> If? the Apple II was continued...

The C-ONE was supposed to be all of these things,
reconfigurable too..  maybe not lower power consumption
though...

The reconfiguration ability is especially interesting to users...
it offers "unlimited" upgrades...

but.. someone has to configure it one way in the first place!
(and make it available for people to try it)

(and there has to be a device for people to try it on that is
"affordable")

and then somebody has to come up with a better idea, and
RE-configure it.

Rich

Follow-Ups:
- Re: If the Apple II was continued...
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

References:
- If the Apple II was continued...
  - From: thingvol <thingvol at yahoo dot com>
- Re: If the Apple II was continued...
  - From: "mmphosis" <markstock@mail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: If the Apple II was continued...
Next by Date: Re: Scans of computer magazines online?
Previous by thread: Re: If the Apple II was continued...
Next by thread: Re: If the Apple II was continued...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread