sicklittlemonkey wrote:
While that's a reasonable approach, I think designing a format that covers 99% of software is quite feasible - given human assistance during the imaging. And I don't think that that human assistance is undesirable or even optional. As Michael has pointed out, you can't algorithmically prove you have successfully captured a complete image.
Which is my point & suggestion exactly! Regards, -- | Mark McDougall | "Electrical Engineers do it | <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug> | with less resistance!"