Re: pascal system

[pausch@saaf.se (Paul Schlyter)]

In article <kNOdnWuedvOlOR3ZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
Alex Freed  <alexf@mirrow.com> wrote:

> Paul Schlyter wrote:
> 
>> Yes - an implementation of UCSD Pascal was integrated in the Apple Pascal
>> system.  It was a compiler, IDE, OS, file system -- all integrated.
> 
> IMHO "bundled" is a better term than "integrated". Now the Turbo Pascal
> was integrated. Just like modern development environments with combined
> editor and compiler.
> 
> UCSD Pascal just came with its own OS and incompatible filesystem.

True --- Turbo Pascal didn't integrate its own OS, which was a clear
advantage.  To summarize: Turbo Pascal was better than Apple Pascal in
almost every respect.  Anyone who can think of even one advantage
Apple Pascal had over Turbo Pascal?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter,  Grev Turegatan 40,  SE-114 38 Stockholm,  SWEDEN
e-mail:  pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW:     http://stjarnhimlen.se/