[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Understanding the Apple II" as PDF - who can host?
- Subject: Re: "Understanding the Apple II" as PDF - who can host?
- From: "mdj" <mdj.mdj@gmail.com>
- Date: 29 May 2006 18:44:00 -0700
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- In-reply-to: <ieHeg.102785$dW3.56597@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
- Injection-info: i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=131.244.3.45; posting-account=W_jMEA0AAAAZdNaersJnc-7Hjv-SIC8Q
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- References: <4479f627$0$11065$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <vPoeg.102610$dW3.85839@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <447b23e4$0$11068$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <ieHeg.102785$dW3.56597@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
- User-agent: G2/0.2
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:8450
Bryan Parkoff wrote:
> They must respect the author when they promise not to sell
> copies which they are reprinted into new book or electronic book.
> I indicate to say when people are welcome to receive copies for free
> while they have agreement not to sell for making money.
> Unfortunately, I have no contact nor address of Jim Sather. I have a
> copy of Understanding the Apple II+ and Apple //e as two books.
> When you are ready to post PDF on the hosting, I suggest what you need
> to make an agreement to respect copyright by answering yes or no before they
> are welcome to download.
> I hope that it makes sense.
Brian,
At the risk of starting a flame war, I feel I must point this out:
Copyright is copyright. Whether or not you, I or anyone else feels that
since something is out of production and the author not contactable is
grounds to distribute it is irrelevant. Law is law.
While I agree in essence with your principles that as long as nobody
else is personally profitting, that redistributing Copyrighted works is
okay, I don't feel that it is sensible that people be forced to agree
to what is in effect a license to obtain a copy.
What you are essentially saying is this: "What I'm doing, by providing
this copy to you is illegal, but I will give you a copy for free, as
long as you agree to provide it to others under the same conditions."
It's a fine principle, sure, but really, the Copyright notice is
preserved in the text. It's up to individuals to decide to what extent
they're prepared to bend Copyright law.
Matt