[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions



heuser.marcus@freenet.de wrote:
The 6502 was already a much less expensive processor than its
competitors, because of a mask retouching technique MOS Technology
developed that saved mask iterations.

I saw that claim on Wikipedia.  Is there any published reference?


There is book about the history of Commodore which is rather detailed
(and entertaining) about the MOS history, too:
http://www.commodorebook.com

The MOS chapter can be read freely here:
http://www.commodorebook.com/view.php?content=toc

Excerpt:

At MOS Technology, John Pavinen pioneered a new way to fabricate
microprocessors. "They were one of the first companies to use
non-contact mask liners," says Peddle. "At that time everybody was
using contact masks."

With non-contact masks, the metal die did not touch the wafer. Once the
engineers worked out all the flaws in the mask, it would last
indefinitely.

---

I guess, Chuck Peddle is a good enough reference ;-)

But clearly the author didn't "get" the subject very well...

Here, he clearly means "the metal *mask* did not touch...", and
later he refers to one of the metal layers being *germanium*!

-michael

Music synthesis for 8-bit Apple II's!
Home page:  http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/

"The wastebasket is our most important design
tool--and it is seriously underused."