[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions

Subject: Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser@floodgap.com>
Date: 18 May 2006 10:22:01 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2, rec.games.video.classic
Organization: Eight Bit Subversives Planning To Replace All PCs with C64s, Inc.
References: <444be7a0$0$11080$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <bruce#fanboy.net-D1D0EB.09010612052006@news.newsreader.com> <b_2dnVaBwopOtvjZRVn-uQ@comcast.com> <1147498080.711381.146590@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <KZCdnYi <e4h33o$d8r$1@rzsun03.rrz.uni-hamburg.de>
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.cbm:15504 comp.sys.apple2:7834 rec.games.video.classic:5007

References trimmed.

John Selck <selck_j@informatik.hgv-hamburg.de> writes:

>Same opcodes but faster clockspeed. Also, CBM switched from NMOS to HMOS.

Strictly speaking, HMOS *is* NMOS because they both still use n-type MOSFETs.

--
      Cameron Kaiser * ckaiser@floodgap.com * posting with a Commodore 128
                personal page: http://www.armory.com/%7Espectre/
  ** Computer Workshops: games, productivity software and more for C64/128! **
                  ** http://www.armory.com/%7Espectre/cwi/ **

References:
- 6502 illegal opcodes questions
  - From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>
- Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
  - From: Bruce Tomlin <bruce#fanboy.net@127.0.0.1>
- Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>
- Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
  - From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de
- Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
  - From: John Selck <selck_j@informatik.hgv-hamburg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: 1977 original apple II restoration: ONE MORE THING...
Next by Date: Re: CFFA Card max size for CF Card
Previous by thread: Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
Next by thread: Re: 6502 illegal opcodes questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread