Timberwoof wrote:
In article <1147542503.916013.187970@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote:
Gregory Weston wrote:
In article <1147467132.115184.24330@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote:
Doug_M wrote:
Radium wrote:
Pre-Macintosh Apple computers stink like human waste
You must be a former TI99/4a owner, or was it the Coleco Adam? Wait, I
know, you had the kit version of the TS-1000 (with 16k expansion pack).
No. I am talking about the non-macintosh apple computer that came
before the Mac and they used those big floppy discs called
"mini-floppies". These computers were in my elementary schools from '89
- '96. Those computers stunk like human-kakaa.
In their day, which was distinctly before 1989, the Apple II line was a
truly phenomenal piece of equipment. It's really not reasonable to
compare it to something that was 10-15 years newer in an industry that's
had such explosive growth and declare it crap.
Well, I rate the Commodore and IBM of the 80's as much higher than the
Apple. IMHO, the Windows OSes of the 80s were the most superior of
their time.
Well, hey were the only Windows OSes of the '80s, so that makes sense.
Good thing you didn't say that Windows 1 and 2 were better than
Macintosh, else I'd have called you a raving lunatic.
In 1991, Windows 3.0 was surely better than Macs.
Of course, my current favorite OS is Windows 98SE.
Oh, you are a raving lunatic. Windows 2000 is much better. That was the
epitome of Windows development. They screwed it up again in Windows XP.
Even Windows ME is better than XP. XP sucks ass. M$ made a big mistake
is switching to their NT-based shiaat.