[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!

Subject: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de
Date: 2 Apr 2006 07:14:46 -0700
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.39.131.177; posting-account=maGggg0AAAAK9xaJv3N4k314iAb7_L6i
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <1143905384.286995.27780@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <1143917792.578353.218880@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <1hd6grh.18dit2xkzxki1N%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <1143977157.089432.92060@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1hd6xr0.okwy8rz2hjw4N%dempson@actrix.gen.nz>
User-agent: G2/0.2
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:6080

> Looks like I answered the same question in 2000, but my original posting
> was back in 1994. See below for repost. Thank goodness for MacSoup!

If one can trust the laws of probability and/or statistics then you'll
post the routine in 2012 again...  ;o)


In short:

- The IIgs CPU tests as a 65802/65816 - no surprise here ;-)

- The 65SC02 (GTE and CMD) tests as a 65C02 as you said and the
datasheets (available at 6502.org) confirm.

- And finally the "Rockwell 338-6503" tests as a 65C02, too.

Case closed, I guess.

Thanks for your effort, David!

bye
Marcus

References:
- Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: "BLuRry" <brendan.robert@gmail.com>
- Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de
- Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
- Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de
- Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)

Prev by Date: Re: Apple //e motherboards
Next by Date: Re: Apple //e motherboards
Previous by thread: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
Next by thread: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread