[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output

Subject: Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de
Date: 22 Mar 2006 20:37:09 -0800
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.39.198.38; posting-account=maGggg0AAAAK9xaJv3N4k314iAb7_L6i
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <pan.2006.03.22.15.20.06.263622@no.spam.gmail.com> <1143054008.479153.168660@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <pan.2006.03.22.21.03.26.718930@no.spam.gmail.com> <qfKdneUYGtmRvL_ZnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@comcast.com>
User-agent: G2/0.2
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5806

> NTSC vs PAL. If you are just going to use black and white, NTSC video will
> work on most PAL televisions. I personally can't verify that, but I have
> enough customers that have verified this for me.

It's true - if the TV isn't restricted to 50 Hz (PAL & SECAM). Most TVs
of the last several years should be OK.
Even the old Philips/Commodore/Amiga monitors are capable of 60 Hz.

Bye
Marcus

References:
- Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
  - From: Thomas Lecomte <deather.dede@no.spam.gmail.com>
- Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
  - From: "BLuRry" <brendan.robert@gmail.com>
- Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
  - From: Thomas Lecomte <deather.dede@no.spam.gmail.com>
- Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
  - From: "Vince Briel" <vbriel@removethisspamcamcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
Next by Date: Re: Apple II Wikipedia articles
Previous by thread: Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
Next by thread: Re: Explanation of the Woz's shift-registers based video output
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread