Re: Intel is lucky they have Apple

[dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)]

ziggy <ziggy@fakedaddress.com> wrote:

> In article <NlnOf.65760$PL5.43382@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>,
>  "Bryan Parkoff" <none@nospam.net> wrote:
> 
> > <rander3127@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> > 1141451006.072338.104010@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com">news:1141451006.072338.104010@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > As their latest whore.  Much like Dell computer.
> > > Why?
> > > Because AMD took 12% of their market this year by kicking their ass in
> > > performance
> > > of their processors.  How Apple could support that odious, corrupt
> > > company is beyond me.
> > >
> >     If you are the Apple II or Apple Mac user, why not alter past history so
> > present history would be different.  It can mean that Steve Worniak is rich
> > to buy Intel CPU instead of 6502 CPU.  Then all Apple II family will be
> > Intel CPU.  It has never happened.  We are interested to buy cheaper Apple
> > II with 6502 CPU that we can afford than Intel machine.
> >     I am not interested to be in a competition against Intel, AMD, or other
> > processors which performance is better for speed.  I am interested to live
> > with the current performance of 6502 CPU what we are happy with this.
> >     Please find the newsgroups what you are interested with the competition
> > that you are against for performance and speed.
> > 
> > Bryan Parkoff
> 
> From what i remember, cost is also why we got 65xx instead of a 68xx..
> The boys couldnt afford the 68xx...