Re: chinook ct-40 is this //c version?

["Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>]

"Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com> wrote in message 
rvadnZNYLeXOQD7enZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com">news:rvadnZNYLeXOQD7enZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> brad wrote:
>> ">
>>
>>>Hmm sorry maybe it was a CT-40 after all I saw. Anyway the model I have
>>>is CT-20c with the samll 'c' being the IIc designator.
>>>
>>>Glenn
>>
>>
>>
>> as in prev posts bill g wants to get his hands on one of these beasts to 
>> see
>> how hard it is to tweak a //c type plug n play hd
>
> There's nothing simple about it--it's a full protocol conversion.

Simple or not, as the case may be, I have a guy looking at the
Smartport protocol, and I can build a single board computer to
handle it. I've already designed several different IDE controllers
so adding that to the conversion circuit should be rather easy.

> Accept smartport request including data, synthesize SCSI/IDE request,
> issue it; handle data from drive, analyze SCSI/IDE status, synthesize
> smartport response including data transfer.

Where's the flow chart?   :o)

> It's a computer in itself.


So is the Unidisk 3.5" drive analog card. So?, where's the problem?

Bill Garber