[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
- Subject: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
- From: Stephen M. Adams <adamst@no.spam>
- Date: 13 Jun 2005 03:17:47 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.sys.mac.apps
- Organization: http://newsguy.com
- References: <1OIpe.17401$QX1.14703@fe06.lga> <dn1re.3203$hK3.2368@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
- User-agent: nn/6.6.5
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:11972 comp.sys.mac.system:49432 comp.sys.mac.apps:24760
BluPhoenyx <BluPhoenyx-@-earthlink.dot.net> writes:
>Does anyone see the similarity here? It seems current Mac users are
>getting a taste of what Apple did to the II series. Perhaps Mac users
>who wish to continue using their current hardware will band together
>like other orphaned platforms. It is hoped they can skip some of the
>problems these other platforms have endured.
There's a world of difference. OS X runs on BOTH platforms. It's not
a lot of extra work for Apple to release the PowerPC version for several
years. It's two YEARS before the transition is complete - so at a
minimum, we'll have two more years of OS X releases for PowerPC. And I
wager it'll be more like 4 (to allow the Intel install base to catch
up).
Current PowerPC Mac owners will have pretty much full support until
2009. That will make my dual-G4 6+ years old. Hardly as if I didn't
get good use out of it. If I needed a new system now, I'd STILL buy
a Mac.
-Stephen
--
Space Age Cybernomad Stephen Adams
malchus842SP@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)