[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?

Subject: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
From: Greg Buchner <apple22@mn.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 02:38:35 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.sys.mac.apps
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com
References: <1OIpe.17401$QX1.14703@fe06.lga> <srhi-E4A53F.20413708062005@news.giganews.com>
User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:11758 comp.sys.mac.system:48625 comp.sys.mac.apps:24436

In article <srhi-E4A53F.20413708062005@news.giganews.com>,
 Shawn Hearn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:

> Nope, the move to Tiger was not a hardware change; it was a OS change. 
> Tiger runs on both G4 and G5 processors.

And G3s.  Includes the B&W G3, the Powerbook G3 (Firewire), and several 
models of both iBooks and iMacs.

Greg B.

-- 
There's just one 2 in my e-mail address, so delete one to e-mail me.

References:
- How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
  - From: "Bible John" <john.doggett@x-files.gov>
- Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
  - From: Shawn Hearn <srhi@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Next by Date: Re: My favorite Apple II
Previous by thread: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Next by thread: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread