[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SF Gate Article on Macs/PC's
- Subject: Re: SF Gate Article on Macs/PC's
- From: "Greg Andrzejewski" <pressyourluck85@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 23:32:17 -0500
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <7EYMd.1931$aW6.794@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net> <IgaNd.1041$UN1.181@news.itd.umich.edu> <hucNd.19626$2e7.5591@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:8056
"John Van Winkle" <john-vw@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:hucNd.19626$2e7.5591@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Greg Andrzejewski" <pressyourluck85@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:IgaNd.1041$UN1.181@news.itd.umich.edu...
>>
>> "Donald C. Lee" <coach41@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:7EYMd.1931$aW6.794@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
>> > http://sfgate.com/columnists/morford/
>>
>> I completely agree, and I'm typing this from a Wintel PC. The Mac, IMHO,
> is
>> now the best choice for someone's first computer. There is just too much
>> maintainance involved with Windows for new user to deal with.
>>
>> However, the software that I use is mostly Windows-specific. Also, the PC
>> I'm using right now I built myself. I put in it exactly what I want and
>> nothing else. Can I do that with a Mac? Nope. Ready-made systems off the
>> shelf, only.
>>
> I agree too. I am getting more anti-micro$haft because of the lousy OS
> they
> write that I am moving to Linux. When I can do all the things in Linux
> that
> I do in Windoze, we will not run Windows. I would like to play with a
> Mac,
> but the nearest place to try one is at least 150 miles away. But I own 2
> older ones and I like playing with them. Yes, I would miss building my
> own
> system, but not a problem. I would rather it run for years without a 6
> month reload schedule.
>
>
>
I'm not sure the blame falls entire on M$. Similar holes may exist in Mac OS
X, but no one is going to exploit them because Macs have, what, a 3% (??)
market share. But there are still those who argue that OS X is one of the
most secure operating systems around. Well, good for it. Microsoft has to
make a product that will run on a seeming infinite combination of hardware
configurations. It's easy to make a secure operating system when you
manufacture and know exactly what the hardware is on every machine that is
running it.
I've used Linux and I don't think it's ready for mainstream. Too much
configuring.
Basically, if you are using a PC, keep windows update turned ON, use IE
sparingly, keep you AV software up to date, monitor your firewall, run
anti-spyware apps, don't so much as breathe on strange email....
-Greg