[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Co-Processor" Apple ?

Subject: Re: "Co-Processor" Apple ?
From: "Robert C." <robc638killspam@sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:21:01 -0400
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Bell Sympatico
References: <bc4b97a8.0408171033.55038b35@posting.google.com> <20040817152628.16860.00002151@mb-m20.aol.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:3239

"Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com> wrote in message

> All these issues caused me to prefer using an annunciator output
> and a pushbutton input for NadaNet--it is both simpler and more
> capable.
>
> -michael
>
> Check out parallel computing for 8-bit Apples on my
> Home page:  http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/

The more I read about NadaNet, the more I think it is "the next best thing"
to true Ethernet.
~Robert~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Co-Processor" Apple ?
  - From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)

References:
- Re: "Co-Processor" Apple ?
  - From: robsgreenneon@startmail.ca (Rob Jones)
- Re: "Co-Processor" Apple ?
  - From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)

Prev by Date: ROM 1 GS Battery
Next by Date: Re: Anyone remember an old TV show, "The Computer Room"?
Previous by thread: Re: "Co-Processor" Apple ?
Next by thread: Re: "Co-Processor" Apple ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread