[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NTSC's Three Dots Per One Pixel

Subject: Re: NTSC's Three Dots Per One Pixel
From: Eric Smith <eric-no-spam-for-me@brouhaha.com>
Date: 27 Jun 2004 18:01:47 -0700
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
References: <40dda923$0$1729$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net> <20040626202439.12238.00000767@mb-m01.aol.com> <40de5395$0$15830$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>
Sender: eric@ruckus.brouhaha.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:1469

"Bryan Parkoff" <bryanparkoff@nospam.com> writes:
>     I agree with you that one pixel is stretched to cover mask holes on
> Apple NTSC Monitor.  I have no idea why stretching pixel is done that it
> looks like 5 dots (mask hole) for violet and green color and 6 dots (mask
> hole) for white color.

Because the holes in the shadow mask don't have any particular fixed
relationship to the pixels of the video signal.

References:
- Re: NTSC's Three Dots Per One Pixel
  - From: "Bryan Parkoff" <bryanparkoff@nospam.com>
- Re: NTSC's Three Dots Per One Pixel
  - From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)
- Re: NTSC's Three Dots Per One Pixel
  - From: "Bryan Parkoff" <bryanparkoff@nospam.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Ethernet & Internet on Apple 2
Next by Date: Have you ever thought secretly about The Simpsons fucking?
Previous by thread: Re: NTSC's Three Dots Per One Pixel
Next by thread: fwha
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread