Re: Number of known Apple II clones (maybe?)

["brad" <mrbrad@ll.net>]

there was a clone in minnesota called the ABACUS ...it died guick...i think
they literally copiedthe ROMs...

anyway if it is not on your list..it should be

brad




"Ernest" <leucoplast@seanet.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:mJy4c.339$_w.58591@attbi_s53...
> gil-galad@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:35:06 GMT, Ernest
> > <leucoplast@seanet.NOSPAM.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Ernest wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've put together a list of known and rumored Apple II clones, and so
> >>> far, it's at 162. I would say that 95% of those are fairly well
> >>> confirmed, but the other %5 might be fakes.
> >>>
> >>> I was guessing that the number would have been closer to 200+, but
> >>> now it's looking like my guess was high.
> >>>
> >>> I've managed to find images of 115 different clones so far, but I'm
> >>> hoping that number will grow substantially once my website opens to
> >>> the public next week. I've bought my domain name (apple2clones.com,)
> >>> and the site is built but I'm waiting on the host server admin to
> >>> give me the green-light to move the site to the new server (very
> >>> fast/no pop-ups!)
> >>>
> >>> I think my website is pretty cool, as vintage computer sites go, but
> >>> I might be a little biased. Hehe. Wayne has seen it.
> >>>
> >>> I'm still looking for pics of the "Boston IV" and "Mackintosh"
> >>> clones, amoung others. Please let me know if anyone has images of
> >>> those systems.
> >>>
> >>> E.
> >>
> >>Yikes! Knode problems. Sorry about the multiple post.
> > Hi,
> >
> > Hey have you got the apple clone by Worldwide Technology called
> > "ITT-2020"? I have a logic circuit diagram on my wall.. haven't got
> > the ITT-2020 anymore but it was the first apple we used at home, quite
> > sucessfully and most apple II software ran quite happly on it.
>
> No. I have plenty of images of the 2020 but I don't have one of my own...
> yet. The MB of the 2020 was built by Apple (it was the Apple II+ board)
> so Apple II software *should* run pretty darn good on it. Hehe.
>
> E.
>