[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?

Subject: Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
From: see_sig_for_valid_email@no.spam (Simon Williams)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:30:00 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Luddite Enterprises
References: <PFk3c.178990$ah.152567@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> <vjl3c.15$sc.1@nwrdny01.gnilink.net> <1gadroa.sbv2ekhazksgN%see_sig_for_valid_email@no.spam>
User-agent: MacSOUP/2.5 (Mac OS X version 10.2.8)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:4237

Simon Williams <see_sig_for_valid_email@no.spam> wrote:

> it might be better to post the file to your webserver and just
> include a link in the message.

Of course I meant better *for me* ;-)
-s
-- 
 T____I____M____E____L____O____R____D
| Apple II Drum & Bassline Sequencer |
|    < http://apple2.luddite.ca >    |
|_[email]__[@]__[luddite]__[.]__[ca]_|

References:
- Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
  - From: "Glenn Jones" <rg.jones@rogers.com>
- Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
  - From: "Steve \"Usotsuki\" Nickolas" <usotsuki@verizon.net>
- Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
  - From: see_sig_for_valid_email@no.spam (Simon Williams)

Prev by Date: Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
Next by Date: Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
Previous by thread: Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
Next by thread: Re: Google doesn't carry posts with binary attachements?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread