[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Geos vs. Geos

Subject: Re: Geos vs. Geos
From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:38:30 -0600
In-reply-to: <ae64f04a.0403061048.32d0072b@posting.google.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm, comp.os.geos.misc
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
References: <ae64f04a.0403061048.32d0072b@posting.google.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:4193 comp.sys.cbm:8834 comp.os.geos.misc:17599

Relying on memory, a review in Computer Shopper asserted that the twoare the same, other than the need to recode for two different 6502platforms.


Roy

Leon Howell wrote:

Has anyone out there ever used *both* C=64/128 Geos and Apple II Geos?

Are they Identical, or at least similar? What are the differences,
other than the graphics resolution? Other than the disk formats, are
they compatible?




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Geos vs. Geos
  - From: puritan_2076@yahoo.com (Leon Howell)

References:
- Geos vs. Geos
  - From: puritan_2076@yahoo.com (Leon Howell)

Prev by Date: Re: Archiving old magazines on website
Next by Date: Re: Z-Ram question.
Previous by thread: Re: Geos vs. Geos
Next by thread: Re: Geos vs. Geos
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread