[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Geos vs. Geos

Subject: Re: Geos vs. Geos
From: Pheuque <Pheuque@antisocial.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 03:00:20 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm, comp.os.geos.misc
Organization: Optimum Online
References: <ae64f04a.0403061048.32d0072b@posting.google.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:4101 comp.sys.cbm:8730 comp.os.geos.misc:17593

As I recall they were in no way exacutable compatible. In other words,
Geopublish 64 would never work on the Apple, but the data files could
be downloaded and with the help of some conversion program made to
load from one version to another. I also think fonts somewhat
compatible.

Apple GEOS was never very popular. It was up against the IIgs, and Mac
which were already resonable established.

On 6 Mar 2004 10:48:50 -0800, puritan_2076@yahoo.com (Leon Howell)
wrote:

>Has anyone out there ever used *both* C=64/128 Geos and Apple II Geos?
>
>Are they Identical, or at least similar? What are the differences,
>other than the graphics resolution? Other than the disk formats, are
>they compatible?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Geos vs. Geos
  - From: puritan_2076@yahoo.com (Leon Howell)

References:
- Geos vs. Geos
  - From: puritan_2076@yahoo.com (Leon Howell)

Prev by Date: Re: Hinge for the Powerbook Titanium G4
Next by Date: Re: Magic Apple II on ebay
Previous by thread: Geos vs. Geos
Next by thread: Re: Geos vs. Geos
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread