On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Paul R. Santa-Maria wrote: > Bill Garber wrote: > > : > Wonderful, except there are 8 screen holes, AFAICT. ;-) > > Sorry, I viewed it as 8 x 8 byte holes, > > instead of 64 x 1 byte holes. > > I do not understand. Are you saying the code is wrong? I take it more as a difference in interpretation (half-empty/half-full). -uso.