[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Amstrad is the worst 8 Bit system
"Ulrich Schreitmueller" <ulrich.schreitmueller@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
wrote in message news:bksvv1$88b$1@newsserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de...
Sinclair QL a.k.a. P.D wrote:
> ???/On 24 Sep 2003 10:49:26 -0700,?(?) Dosius <steve@dosius.zzn.com>
> ??????/wrote:
>
>> masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl Philtmoon) wrote in message
>> news:<26e9ab06.0309231324.59dae465@posting.google.com>...
>>
>>> Most of the games look bad - 50% are 1:1 Speccy ports and all the
>>> games that look nice at first don�t look nice when scrolling or
>>> sprite-movement starts.
>>>
>>> And for serious users - hey , in 1985 the ATARI ST was released and
>>> the ST kicks the CPC to the moon.
>>>
>>> So nobody needs this piece of shit.
>>
>>
>> GoAT.
>>
>> Besides the Apple IIgs pounds them all into the dust (similar to how
>> the SNES pounds the Genesis into the dust even though the Genesis has
>> a 68000 and the SNES has, like the IIgs, a 65816).
>>
>> -uso.
>
>
> Yes I agree, especially since Apple IIgs' sales surpassed the
> Commodore 64, SPectrum, Amiga and Atari ST sales combined...
> WAKE up, it's time for bed dude!
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT!
Please keep these fucking childish "my obsolete computer can beat up
your obsolete computer" shit-flinging tournaments to your respective
groups, or at least out of comp.sys.amstrad.8bit.
Thank you.
It's on topic and if you don't like it you can filter it, ignore it or
otherwise quit your whining.