Re: The Children of Woz (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)

[supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)]

anonymous@anonymous.anet (anonymous) wrote:

>Then (still going with the train of thought that I am Supertimer), I would
>proceed to spout off a long list of drivel about the glories of AMD
>processors in PC's and go on to grumble about how Apple is evil because of
>the Macintosh platform. Then I would proceed to post in every single
>thread, bringing up AMD and/or programs that barely remotely resemble the
>Apple II version of AppleWorks which run only on AMD equipped PC's and not
>Intel based PC's, while giving myself a hand shandy, grinning proudly
>because I'm a total dinkmash who's opinions are worth less than a bucket
>of old horse piss behind the barn.

So you think I am an AMD fan who hangs out in csa2
for nothing better than AMD advocacy?  If AMD
enthusiasm has leaked into some of my posts, it is
because it is an extension of my Apple II enthusiasm.

And you think the majority of my post have to do with
AMD.  Check out my post history in Google Groups.
You will find that before I dropped into csa2 again
recently, I have posted in csa2 hundreds of times,
nearly all of them to help other Apple II users.

Csa2 was full of flame wars then and apparently it
has not changed.

Uh, going back to read your comment, I see:

>bringing up...programs that barely remotely resemble the
>Apple II version of AppleWorks

My recent reference to SuperWorks was a reply
to someone who wanted to know if there was a PC
version of AppleWorks.  SuperWorks was an
AppleWorks workalike for the PC by Remarkable
Technologies.  This is a fact.  It does not "barely
remotely resemble the Apple II version of
AppleWorks."  It was practically a PC version of
AppleWorks.