Re: DSK format specification

["Michael Pender" <mpender@hotmail.com>]

Omigosh!!  ProBlock version 1.0 could do that back in 1990!!

Seriously though, I thought the format would be a bit more complex.

- Mike

Bill Garber <willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote in message
rIGcnTjBDLHzno2iXTWJkg@comcast.com">news:rIGcnTjBDLHzno2iXTWJkg@comcast.com...
>
> "Michael Pender" <mpender@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:rLOPa.250$Y%3.201@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...
> > I'm thinking about adding DSK format support to a program I wrote.  Can
> > anyone direct me to a specification for the most current version of the
> file
> > format?
> > I've read the FAQ, but I need to know the internals of the format, e.g.
> what
> > fields are present, sector ordering, etc.
>
> AFAIK, a DSK is simply a raw copy of the disk itself.
> The file is exactly the same size as a complete disk.
> A 140k comes out 143,360 and an 800k will be 819,200.
>
> Bill @ GarberStreet Enterprises };-)
> Web Site - http://garberstreet.netfirms.com
> Email - willy46pa@comcast.net
>
>
>
> ---
> This email ain't infected, dude!
>
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 6/30/03
>
>