[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Y2K ProDOS 8 (2.0.3)

Subject: Re: Y2K ProDOS 8 (2.0.3)
From: obsbedia2@aol.com (Obsbedia2)
Date: 09 Jul 2003 10:02:26 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References: <nospam-9FFA34.04264909072003@clmboh1-nws3.columbus.rr.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:32658

<< Runing ProODS 8 (2.0.3) under KEGS-OSX on  a PowerMac, I see that some 
files have a year of 103, while others display 03. The former show up in 
the catalog as <NO DATE>. Is there a optimal way to deal with this? >>

No.
Old clock card system from the time when memory was expensive.  Just the last
two digits (03) are present for the computer to read, so unless the program
you're running is set up for it, it will assume it's 1903.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Y2K ProDOS 8 (2.0.3)
  - From: willi@wilserv.com (Willi Kusche)

References:
- Y2K ProDOS 8 (2.0.3)
  - From: "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IIgs MB repair info
Next by Date: Re: Error $110A
Previous by thread: Y2K ProDOS 8 (2.0.3)
Next by thread: Re: Y2K ProDOS 8 (2.0.3)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread