[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Low-level vs. High-level programming (was My First Computer)
- Subject: Re: Low-level vs. High-level programming (was My First Computer)
- From: "Randy McLaughlin" <randy@nospam.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 15:51:08 -0500
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2, rec.games.video.classic, comp.os.cpm
- References: <7a1fd8df.0301181540.30e19a40@posting.google.com> <l%1Ia.120$RK2.11917426@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <%82Ia.34625$QS4.4604@fe05.atl2.webusene <038073c84e3fe3a00a40ffb3fe9d76b5@TeraNews> <bcvu45$1tjm$1@merope.saaf.se> <9856b2ab0276084facaaa804f3a5f414@TeraNews> <aA4Ja.10576$bH3.2854@fe02.atl2.webusenet.com> <bd2vb9$1slo$1@barad-dur.nas.com> <nQdJa.12702$bH3.3868@fe02.atl2.webusenet.com> <bd54cg$480$1@barad-dur.nas.com>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.cbm:59100 comp.sys.apple2:31738 rec.games.video.classic:59251 comp.os.cpm:13470
"White Flame (aka David Holz)" <whiteflame52@y.a.h.o.o.com> wrote in message
news:bd54cg$480$1@barad-dur.nas.com...
> "Randy McLaughlin" <randy@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:nQdJa.12702$bH3.3868@fe02.atl2.webusenet.com...
> > Yes I read your post, all I saw was your opinion without any references
to
> > back them up. Do you expect anyone to accept your opinion over the
> > published works of internationally accepted authorities? A dictionary
may
> > not be much, but at least it is a recognized authority. If you have an
> > authority we can lookup I will not be happy, but I will acknowledge it.
>
> A dictionary is not a recognized authority on software engineering.
>
> --
> White Flame (aka David Holz)
> http://www.white-flame.com/
> (spamblock in effect)
Dictionarries are recognized authorities on definitions, I don't know if you
noticed but the thread is an argument on the definition of programming.